Other English names: Black Chachalaca;
Black Pajuil; Black Penelopina
Other scientific names: Penelope niger
Spanish names: Pajuil (G, H, S); Chacha Negra (G); Pajuil Negro
(G); Chacha Negra (E)
There appear to three races of the Highland Guan (unless
there is another race from Mexico that I am unaware of). Dickey
and van Rossem describe the interior subspecies P. n.
dickeyi of El Salvador and Honduras as having brownish
red skin around the eye and a bluish hue to the males’
plumage, whilst the subspecies found on the volcanoes along
the Pacific slope P. n. nigra has bluish or purplish
skin around the eye and a greenish hue to the males’
plumage. The females of these first two species are said to
be similar. van Rossem (1934, cited in Monroe) also describes
a subspecies from Nicaragua P. n. rufescens, where
the male is similar to dickeyi, but the female differs
in being more rufescent. Monroe discusses how he could not
distinguish between dickeyi and nigra on
plumage characteristics alone and commented on how the skin
area of specimens loses its colour and so cannot be used long
after death.
This species seems to be fairly common throughout the central
highlands of northern Central America and Oaxaca and Chiapas
in southern Mexico, though they seem to have mostly been extirpated
from many of the volcanoes on the Pacific slope of El Salvador,
where they were formerly common (Dickey and van Rossem). They
are threatened by both hunting and habitat destruction (Howell
and Webb).
Dickey and van Rossem collected one bird on February 26th
which was laying. They found no nests, but mention that the
locals reported two or three white eggs are laid in a nest
that is comprised of only a few twigs placed in the crown
of a tall tree fern. This was supported by Thurber et al,
who were shown a nest in the crown of a tree fern containing
two eggs. Thurber et all discuss 4 nest sites reported by
Pullen (1978) and also discuss how Vuilleumier had believed
that the species nests on the ground (like other Cracids),
but that Vaurie (1968) had disputed this claim because it
was based on a single instance and that ground nesting was
the exception rather than the rule. They also state that Rowley
(1984) reported on 16 nests, only one of which was on the
ground. I have not seen any of these papers that were discussed
by Thurber et al.
Highland Guans are prone to desert nests if they are disturbed
by humans (Pullen, 1978 cited in Thurber et al), though Rowley
(1984) made limited observations of one nest which was discovered
with two eggs on 7th May. The eggs hatched on the evening
of 8th May and the chicks left the nest soon after (though
perhaps prematurely because of disturbance). Pullen saw downy
chicks on 4th and 24th April, which Thurber et al suggest
indicate that laying may begin in late February or early March.
They also suggest that females that have been found incubating
in May might represent second nesting attempts. Females were
seen with Pullets (never more than two) by Pullen and Thurber
et al, between April and late November. Puller (1978, cited
in Thurber et al) twice saw males near, but not with, females
with young and concluded that males do not interact with females
after mating. However, Delacour and Amadon (1973, cited in
Thurber et al) argued that unless proven otherwise, Highland
Guans may be assumed to be monogamous like other Cracids.
I have seen males on the ground near to females with young
at Biotopo del Quetzal in early November.
I have found little information on feeding behaviour, though
Dickey and van Rossem described two birds which “had
their crops stuffed with round, hard, green berries about
the size of hazelnuts”. They also describe the courtship
behaviour, involving a male that whirled round and round like
a dog chasing its tail, and they mention a bit about roosting
behaviour in the highest pines at around 150 feet.
According to Thurber et al, Pullen (1978) counted singing
males at Montecristo in El Salvador (when they are most active
in February and March) and recorded 22 in his study area which
measured 180km2, and they commented that this gave 8.6 hectares
per singing male (the maths doesn’t work out. There
is certainly nothing like 180km2 of cloud forest at his Montecristo
study site, so they must mean 180 hectares, which would give
8.2 hectares per singing male, not 8.6). However, he estimated
territories to be much smaller than this; the three that he
closely studied had areas of 2.8, 4.0 and 6.3 hectares.
Habitat
This species is mainly found in cloud forest, but they also
wander into pine-oak and second growth areas. Generally found
in rich forests in areas with dense undergrowth.
Birdlife has a factsheet on this species www.birdlife.net
Biblioteca de Sonidos Aves de Mexico has a recording of this
species www.ecologia.edu
Known sites
Guatemala
I have seen or heard this species at Aguas Amargas, Biotopo
del Quetzal, Tarrales and Volcan Atitlan
Honduras
I have seen this species at Celaque and La Muralla
El Salvador
I have heard a bird at El Pital and seen in the mist, what
was probably this species, at Montecristo, which is a known
sight.
Calls
A recording of the call is to be found on ‘Bird Songs
of Belize, Guatemala and Mexico’ by Dale Delaney
Delacour, J. and Amadon, D. (1973) Curassows and related
birds. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., xv + 247pp.
Pullen, T. M. Jr. (1978) A field study of the Black Chachalaca
(Penelopina nigra Fraser) in El Salvador. San Salvador: Ministerio
de Agricultura y Ganaderia, Unidad de Parques Nacionales.
Mimeo.
|